Commercial Services

There is a lot more to airtightness than just testing. If a builder has a low air tightness permeability rate that they are targeting of at least 10 m3/h/m2@50Pa, the builder will need consultancy advice before and during construction.
It should be the goal of every builder to pass an airtightness test the first time every time, for a project that requires a particular leakage rate.
The best way to ensure you pass an airtightness test the first time, is to contact Efficiency Matrix. It will cost you nothing to call us, and one of our Principal Air Tightness Testing experts will assess your project and advise you on what services you require to minimise your risk. We empower your staff to be able to leverage off our experience. You may need to use less of our services in the future.
Remember:

It’s expensive to retrofit air tightness, it can cost TENS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS
It’s a great learning experience to use our consultancy
Everything leaks air

What is an Airtightness Desktop Review?
An experienced Efficiency Matrix Principal consultant reviews your drawings and other information that may be provided and identifies potential risk areas, advising you on details, materials and any possible improvements. This service has saved some of our client’s tens of thousands of dollars.
The Desktop Review also includes the redline markup, which is crucial with respect to airtightness, to understand which walls make up part of the building envelope.
If you are unsure about the benefits of this service, give us a call, we are here to help, and it could save you thousands of dollars.

What is an Airtightness on-site Design Review/Workshop?
Our Principal Airtightness Testing Consultants will come to your site and have a meeting with your project team and main contractors. The on-site design review will determine how air testing has been incorporated into the design; we go over how responsibilities across details and interfaces are being allocated and nut out where improvements and cost savings could be realised to achieve the construction of a better performing building.
If you are not sure if you need this service, give us a call, we are here to help, and it could save you thousands of dollars.

Why is ventilation compliance not being met across the industry, and what is contributing to this non-compliance?
It is Not a matter of compliance. The right question is more like, “Why the systems are not performing as designed?” The NCC does not demand any proof of performance by empirical test (the test is prescribed in AS4254.2 2012 but that section of AS is subsequently excluded from the NCC requirements in 2015 – in the explanatory note, so it is technically a grey area as the explanatory note is NOT enforceable). Traditionally, the compliance issue has always been dault with using deem to satisfied methods. As long as the duct manufacturers and installers only have to follow the prescribed methods and procedures for compliance. In the past, only special buildings may prescribe pressure testing of ductworks by the mechanical consultants.

Ducts installed with foam

Is a lack of compliance checking contributing to this (out of sight, out of mind)?
It is more like the contractor did not receive feedback on non-optimum practices, therefore unknowing carry on the poor practices. The other reason is that the industry focus on the volume of air being delivered at various outlets as a key performance indicator for HVAC ducts. As long as the HVAC contractor meets the air delivery specified, it’s a job well done. Regardless of the level of leakage. Sometimes the slight oversized air handler ( safety margin) also reduces the incentive to improve duct sealing as the installers know there is going to be enough slack.

Target Leak 2l/s 2 200Pa minimum leakage performance of .7l/s/m2&50Pa as per BSRIA BTS03 PC1 and PC2 there is no explicit leakage target. There are clean room standards that focus on mechanical system filtration that doesn’t have an air leakage target however and air tight room can greatly effect the effectiveness of a filtration system.Understanding the minimum recommended target leakage rates is crucial for maintaining the integrity and safety of laboratory environments at various physical containment levels. Here’s how it relates to PC1, PC2, PC3, and PC4 labs:
PC1 and PC2 Labs
– Minimum Recommended Target Leakage Rate: The minimum target leakage rate for PC1 and PC2 labs is 0.7 L/s/m² at 50 Pa. This target ensures that the laboratory maintains proper airflow and containment to handle the respective risks of these environments.
– Considerations: While 0.7 L/s/m² at 50 Pa is the standard, this recommendation can be overruled by a consultant based on specific conditions or requirements of the facility. Such decisions are typically based on factors like local regulations, building design, and specific operational needs.
PC3 and PC4 Labs
– Minimum Recommended Target Leakage Rate: For PC3 and PC4 labs, the recommended target leakage rate is 2 L/s at 200 Pa. This higher rate reflects the need for more stringent containment measures due to the dangerous nature of the pathogens handled.
– Considerations: Given the increased risk associated with the pathogens in PC3 and PC4 labs, maintaining this leakage rate is critical to prevent any escape of hazardous materials. The high-pressure criteria ensure that the lab environment is tightly controlled and secure.
By maintaining these recommended leakage rates, labs at each containment level can more effectively manage airflow, ensure containment of hazardous materials, and protect both laboratory personnel and the external environment from exposure risks.

The Importance of Air Tightness Testing, Thermal Imaging, and Comprehensive Reporting for Cold Store Structures (Incorporating ASTM E1186 Standards)

Air tightness testing, combined with thermal imaging, is crucial for evaluating and ensuring the energy efficiency of cold storage structures, such as cold rooms and freezers. This dual approach, when conducted in alignment with ASTM E1186: Standard Practices for Air Leakage Site Detection in Building Envelopes and Air Barrier Systems, ensures precise and reliable identification of thermal anomalies and air leakage points. By addressing these issues, businesses can achieve significant cost savings, reduce energy consumption, and protect stored goods from spoilage due to heat intrusion.

Key Areas of Heat Leakage in Cold Storage
Thermal imaging is particularly effective in identifying heat leakage in the following areas, as emphasized by ASTM E1186:

Insulation Panel Joins: Critical points where panels meet.
Seals on Entrances and Exits: Includes both internal and external seals around doors.
Floor-to-Ceiling Joins and Corners: Vulnerable areas for thermal bridging.
Penetration Points: Such as those for electrical or plumbing installations.
External Surfaces: All accessible external areas around the cold storage structure.
ASTM E1186 provides detailed methodologies for detecting air leakage sites, ensuring that inspections are both thorough and repeatable. Cold rooms must be operational and under normal load conditions during inspections to ensure accurate identification of thermal faults. A measurable temperature difference is necessary, as specified in the standard, to detect issues effectively.

The Importance of Reporting and Marking Locations
In alignment with ASTM E1186, accurate reporting and precise documentation are critical components of the inspection process. Marking up the exact locations of identified issues on a floor plan is essential for several reasons:

Effective Mitigation: Ensures that contractors and maintenance teams can address issues accurately, reducing the likelihood of missed or unresolved faults.
Avoiding Confusion: Marked-up plans eliminate guesswork, streamlining remediation efforts and avoiding misunderstandings during repairs.
Standardized Validation: Reports based on ASTM E1186 guidelines provide a consistent framework for verifying that remediation has been successfully completed.
Actionable Insights: Comprehensive reporting provides stakeholders with a clear understanding of the scope and impact of identified faults, enabling better decision-making for energy efficiency improvements.
Benefits of Thermal Imaging and Air Tightness Testing
Conducting regular thermal imaging and air tightness testing on insulated cold storage structures offers multiple advantages:

Energy and Cost Savings: Minimizes energy losses, leading to reduced electricity bills.
Reduced Spoilage Risk: Provides confidence that stored goods are protected from heat intrusion.
Quality Assurance: Verifies the integrity of installation and manufacturing against standardized benchmarks.
Fault Detection: Identifies unsealed penetrations, leaks, or other hidden issues invisible to the naked eye.
Actionable Remediation: Detailed floor plan markups enhance the accuracy and efficiency of corrective actions.
ASTM E1186 Standards for Thermal Surveys with Air Tightness
ASTM E1186 outlines best practices for conducting air leakage site detection, including:

Inspection Methods: Recommendations for visual inspections, smoke generation, tracer gases, and infrared thermography.
Environmental Conditions: Requirements for maintaining temperature differentials, humidity levels, and operational states during testing.
Testing Equipment: Specifications for devices used to detect air leakage, ensuring accuracy and reliability.
Reporting and Documentation: Guidelines for capturing and presenting data in a standardized, actionable format.
Verification: Procedures for confirming that identified leaks have been sealed and retested.
Applications of Thermal Imaging and ASTM E1186
Thermal imaging and air tightness testing, guided by ASTM E1186, can be performed:

During Commissioning: For quality assurance during installation.
As Routine Checks: To assess energy efficiency and operational performance.
For Insurance Claims: To document pre-existing conditions or justify corrective actions.
By integrating thermal imaging, air tightness testing, and the rigorous methodologies of ASTM E1186, businesses can ensure their cold storage systems operate at peak efficiency, delivering long-term cost savings, reliable temperature control, and standardized quality assurance.

Underfloor Plenum Air Tightness Testing: Ensuring Efficiency and Compliance

Underfloor air distribution (UFAD) systems have become a highly popular and effective method for distributing air in modern buildings worldwide. To maximize the efficiency and performance of these systems, underfloor plenum air tightness testing is essential. Testing ensures compliance with industry standards, such as BSRIA BG65-2016, which outlines best practices for airtightness in ductwork and air distribution systems.

The Importance of Underfloor Plenum Testing
Underfloor plenums play a critical role in UFAD systems, acting as the medium for air distribution. However, achieving airtightness in these systems can be challenging, especially in large-scale projects. Air leakage in underfloor plenums can lead to:
– Energy Losses: Leaks result in wasted conditioned air, increasing energy consumption and operational costs.
– Uneven Air Distribution: Leakage disrupts the balance of air distribution, impacting indoor comfort levels.
– System Inefficiency: Reduced airflow undermines the efficiency of HVAC systems, requiring more energy to maintain desired conditions.
– Compliance Issues: Failing to meet airtightness standards like BSRIA BG65-2016 can result in non-compliance with building codes and performance benchmarks.

Meeting BSRIA BG65-2016 Standards
Efficiency Matrix has extensive experience in helping clients achieve the airtightness benchmarks outlined in BSRIA BG65-2016, which specifies:
– 1 l/s/m² @ 50 Pa: The recommended level for general compliance.
– 0.7 l/s/m² @ 50 Pa: A more stringent target for high-performance systems.

We have been directly involved in targeting both of these leakage rates across numerous projects, ensuring that systems are both compliant and optimized for energy efficiency. Achieving these tight tolerances requires advanced diagnostic methods, precise execution, and robust quality assurance measures.

Advanced Testing Methodologies: Ultrasonic and Smoke Testing
Efficiency Matrix specializes in state-of-the-art techniques for diagnosing and troubleshooting air leakage in UFAD systems, including ultrasonic testing and smoke testing:
– Ultrasonic Testing:
– Ultrasonic testing is particularly effective for troubleshooting UFAD systems during the construction phase.
– This method is ideal for inspecting baffle walls and identifying small, hard-to-detect leaks that are not visible to the naked eye.
– Ultrasonic equipment emits sound waves that detect gaps or weaknesses in the plenum structure, providing a precise and efficient way to locate faults before the system is operational.
– Smoke Testing:
– Smoke testing is another proven methodology used to visualize airflow paths and detect leaks in underfloor systems.
– By introducing non-toxic smoke into the plenum, areas of air leakage can be quickly identified and marked for remediation.
– This technique is highly effective for pinpointing larger leaks or areas where air escapes through building facades, cores, or improper seals.

Preventing Leakage Through Facades and Building Cores
One of the critical elements of Efficiency Matrix’s air tightness testing is ensuring that leakage points in underfloor plenums are not through the facade or the core of the building. Leakage in these areas can lead to:
– Significant Energy Efficiency Hits: Air escaping through facades or building cores directly impacts heating or cooling loads, driving up energy consumption.
– Loss of Air Control: Leakage to external environments compromises the integrity of air distribution, reducing the ability to maintain consistent conditions within the space.
– Difficult Repairs: Sealing leaks in facades or cores is often more challenging and costly, making accurate testing and prevention even more important.

Efficiency Matrix employs advanced diagnostic techniques, such as ultrasonic testing and smoke testing, to precisely locate leakage points and differentiate between internal and external leaks. By ensuring leakage is minimized and that the plenum remains sealed from the building’s facade and core, we help clients achieve significant energy savings and operational efficiency.

Expertise and Capabilities at Efficiency Matrix
Efficiency Matrix brings unparalleled expertise to underfloor plenum air tightness testing, with advanced equipment and proven methodologies for testing, troubleshooting, and documenting issues in UFAD systems.

Key Areas of Expertise:
– Advanced Software Processes: Streamlined analysis and reporting ensure efficient project execution.
– Ultrasonic Testing: High-precision detection of leaks during construction, especially in baffle walls.
– Smoke Testing: Visual confirmation of leaks in operational and under-construction plenums.
– Specialist Processes for Complex Issues: Innovative sealing methods for leaks that cannot be addressed through conventional approaches.

Large Projects Delivered
Efficiency Matrix has successfully completed several large-scale projects, including:
– Nishi (Canberra): 27,411 sqm floor area.
– 150 Collins St: 20,000 sqm floor area.
– Deakin University Corporate Centre (Burwood): High-performance plenum solutions.
– 60 Cremorne St and Rosella Building: 10,000 sqm floor area.
– Latrobe City Council Library: Tailored airtightness solutions for unique project needs.

These achievements reflect our ability to handle both ducted and non-ducted UFAD systems effectively.

Compliance with BSRIA BG65-2016
Testing and commissioning underfloor plenums in accordance with BSRIA BG65-2016 ensures:
– Compliance with Industry Standards: Meeting prescribed airtightness levels.
– Enhanced System Performance: Optimized airflow and energy efficiency.
– Quality Assurance: Verification of system integrity through rigorous testing and documentation.
– Long-Term Savings: Reduced energy costs and maintenance requirements due to minimized leakage.

Why Choose Efficiency Matrix?
Underfloor plenums can be challenging to seal cost-effectively, but Efficiency Matrix has the expertise and tools to make it achievable. Our approach includes:
– In-depth Understanding of UFAD Systems: Knowledgeable in both design and implementation challenges.
– Specialized Equipment for Air Tightness Testing: Advanced tools for precise leak detection and resolution.
– Tailored Solutions: Customized approaches for each project to ensure efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
– Focus on Critical Leakage Points: Ensures leakage is not through facades or building cores, which cause significant energy efficiency impacts.
– Expertise in Targeting Tight Leakage Rates: Proven experience in meeting both 1 l/s/m² @ 50 Pa and the more stringent 0.7 l/s/m² @ 50 Pa targets, ensuring compliance with BSRIA BG65-2016.

By ensuring airtight underfloor plenums and addressing critical leakage locations with advanced methods, we help clients achieve higher energy efficiency, better indoor air quality, and compliance with critical industry standards like BSRIA BG65-2016.

The Importance of Air Tightness Testing for Data Centre Integrity and UFAD Systems

In modern data centres and server rooms, maintaining precise environmental conditions and ensuring system safety is critical. Achieving these goals relies heavily on air tightness testing for room integrity, underfloor air distribution (UFAD) systems, and containment solutions. This practice is vital for meeting stringent Service Level Agreements (SLAs) related to humidity, temperature, and fire suppression system functionality while ensuring optimal energy efficiency.

Critical Considerations for Data Centre Air Tightness

1. Building Envelope Integrity
The building fabric or envelope is often overlooked in discussions about data centre performance. However, it plays a crucial role in:
– Containing and suppressing fire.
– Maintaining stable environmental conditions to extend hardware longevity.
– Reducing energy costs for temperature and humidity control.

Common Leakage Points include:
– Unsealed gaps under false floors where the concrete slab meets plaster walls.
– Cable cutouts or penetrations in walls.
– Corners or wall-floor junctions lacking proper sealing.

2. Bias Pressure and Fire Suppression Systems
Understanding the baseline or bias pressure in a data hall is critical, as it influences fire suppression system performance. Bias pressure refers to the normal pressure acting in a room under operational conditions.

Fire suppression systems operate in two modes:
– Continuous Mixing: Where air conditioners remain operational, high leakage rates can compromise fire suppressant distribution.
– Descending Interface: Where air conditioners are off, fire suppressant gases settle and leakage at low levels can negate suppression efforts.

Elevated bias pressures or unsealed areas under UFAD systems and walls can result in ineffective fire suppression and poor environmental control.

3. UFAD Systems with Elevated Pressure
UFAD systems often operate at elevated pressures (up to 10 Pa) to ensure optimal air delivery. Air tightness is essential to prevent unfiltered air from entering the system and to maintain consistent airflow and temperature. Leakage under walls or through penetrations can compromise the system, leading to inefficiency and uncontrolled air distribution.

—

Hot Aisle and Cold Aisle Containment Solutions
Hot aisle and cold aisle containment systems are widely used in data halls to improve cooling efficiency and hardware reliability. Key benefits include:
– Improved Temperature Control: Containment reduces mixing of hot and cold air, enabling more precise cooling.
– Energy Savings: Enhanced airflow management reduces energy consumption by minimizing cooling system workload.
– Extended Hardware Life: Stable environmental conditions protect sensitive equipment.

However, the performance of containment solutions depends on their airtightness. Efficiency Matrix specializes in:
– Testing Containment Solutions: Evaluating airtightness and leakage rates under operating pressures.
– Stress Testing: Ensuring containment solutions can handle over-pressurization events safely.
– Leakage Rate Testing: Quantifying leakage to assess compliance with operational pressure requirements.

—

Ensuring Compliance and Performance in Data Halls
To meet SLA requirements and protect your investment, regular testing and inspection are critical:

1. Fire Suppression System Functionality
– Verify that the room performs as expected during fire suppression activation:
– Do extraction fans and dampers shut off?
– Does the pressure relief vent function appropriately?
– Are baseline pressures measured and understood?
– Ensure the integrity of penetrations, particularly under false floors, to prevent suppressant gas from escaping.

2. Bias Pressure Monitoring
– Measure bias pressures during normal operation and under test conditions (e.g., everything turned off).
– Ensure the room operates within acceptable pressure ranges, avoiding extreme negative or positive pressures that can compromise system performance.

3. Building Fabric Inspections
– Regularly inspect and seal penetrations caused by new installations.
– Ensure that underfloor plenums and return air plenums are airtight for both fire safety and energy efficiency.

4. Routine Air Tightness and Integrity Testing
– Conduct yearly integrity tests to evaluate air tightness and ensure compliance with fire suppression standards.
– Evaluate containment systems to confirm their compatibility with fire suppression and environmental controls.

—

Added Value from Efficiency Matrix
Efficiency Matrix provides advanced testing and consultancy services for data centres, including:
– Air Tightness Testing: Ensuring room and plenum airtightness for compliance with SLAs and operational safety.
– Containment Solution Testing: Verifying airtightness, performing stress tests for over-pressurization safety, and measuring leakage rates.
– Expert Diagnostics: Identifying and sealing problematic areas, including cable penetrations and false floor leakage points.
– Performance Optimization: Supporting efficient fire suppression, temperature stability, and energy savings.

—
Key Takeaways for Data Hall Operators
– The airtightness of building envelopes and UFAD systems is fundamental to maintaining energy efficiency, hardware longevity, and fire suppression integrity.
– Hot/cold aisle containment solutions require regular testing to ensure compatibility with fire suppression systems and to optimize energy efficiency.
– Monitoring bias pressure and addressing air leakage under elevated pressures are critical for data centre performance and safety.

By prioritizing air tightness and routinely testing systems, operators can ensure their data centres are efficient, compliant, and protected from potential risks. Think of integrity testing not just as a regulatory requirement but as a way to enhance system performance, reliability, and overall cost savings.

tion Features That Set Efficiency Matrix Apart
Thermal Imaging Analysis:

Documents insulation coverage and calculates temperature differentials to identify inconsistencies.
Provides detailed reporting to validate construction quality and energy efficiency.
Defect Reporting:

Connects to video tutorials and web resources for easy, actionable guidance.
Helps trades understand and rectify defects with minimal supervision.
Marked-Up Floor Plans:

Offers precise defect mapping for trades to locate and fix issues efficiently.
Facilitates revisiting documented areas before finishes are installed.
Prediction Capabilities:

Enables early identification of potential performance issues, allowing proactive remediation before blower door tests.
Our Core Inspection Philosophies
Save Time Onsite: Efficient processes reduce downtime, speeding up project progress.
Empower Knowledge: Equip trades and homeowners with the tools to resolve issues effectively.
Drive Better Outcomes: Ensure high-performing building envelopes through precise defect management.
Streamlined Reporting: Deliver fast, accurate, and actionable insights for stakeholders.
Collaboration-Ready: Foster seamless communication and coordination among all project teams.
Bringing Value to Modern Construction
Efficiency Matrix’s inspections are designed to help clients meet stringent performance standards for air tightness, thermal consistency, and fire safety. By combining innovative technology with a commitment to accuracy and collaboration, so that every project achieves a better outcome in terms of energy efficiency, safety, and long-term performance.

Our tools and expertise align with our vision: to empower the construction industry with the insights and resources needed to build better, faster, and smarter.

When trying to build airtight, the real magic is NOT the air-tightness testing itself, it’s actually the Building Design, continuous QA (Air Barrier Integrity Auditing) during construction and ensuring an “Air-tightness Champion” has been appointed by the builder.

The key features of conducting air barrier integrity auditing are:

Locating areas of concern with exact locations of the issues.
Verification of building materials being used, that will enable an air barrier that lasts
Timely reporting of the issues, so that remediation can be undertaken before finishes
Capturing photographs of remediation works
Confirming or finding issues in building facades/junctions for a continuous air barrier using Ultrasonic technology.
Recommendations of remediations required, with materials/products that comply with the Australian Building code.
Building inspectioinIf a QA process is not conducted regularly at key intervals during construction,

airtightness targets can become a very expensive exercise,

remediation works that happen after construction can have the potential to not last the test of time,
or remediation works may not even be possible due to safety.
Location, Location, Location

Commercial Buildings can be large and complicated, so it is important, that plans are marked up with problematic details, if trades cannot find issues, they just won’t fix them. If issues cannot be relocated to verify remediation, then the whole process of air barrier integrity auditing is rendered ineffective and pointless.

Verification of building materials.

In some circumstances, building materials specified for the air barrier may be inadvertently costed out, or supplied with an inappropriate product. Certain tapes or sealants may not be compatible together or may react undesirably when exposed to environments during construction. It’s important to catch these issues during construction so that they can be repaired in a timely manner before finishes.

Report turnover

Projects can move extremely fast, and it is not uncommon for the fit-out to begin before service risers are complete. Once an inspection is conducted, a report must be issued with all the location details marked off an up to date floor plan, recommended fix and dimensions of the issue, with the direction of how the air barrier should be continued.

Photo evidence

Photo’s of issues should be marked up to clearly articulate to trades the whole that must be closed in. Airtightness is not always obvious.

Ultrasonic Sound Survey

Troubleshooting during construction
Troubleshooting and confirming air leakage through the air barrier when the building is under construction is difficult. There are technologies available to help confirm non-obvious gaps in building elements. Ultrasonic sound auditing can add significant value.
An array of ultrasonic transmitters which generate ultrasonic waves are set up on the outside. This makes it possible to find gaps in curtain wall facades, leaks through building elements, door frames/window frames and window/door seals, even ducts and plenums.Ultra Sonic Audit
The ultrasonic detector picks up ultrasound via a microphone and converts the inaudible ultrasound into an audible frequency and in some circumstances overlays the frequency emission location on top of a visual image with a representative highlighted colour. A visual representation is bundled together using a directional array of receivers capable of picking up ultrasonic sound waves while suppressing other noise and outputting onto an image. Because ultrasonic waves are so directional, from the emission source surveys can be undertaken on partly completed wall details. When auditing ultrasonic sound gets louder the closer you get to the leak and is quickly muffled as it moves through the air. The ultrasonic leak detection can pinpoint even the smallest leaks, during a partly constructed building, which is the most economic time to organise a solution.
Curtain wall air leak
Recommended Remediation
During construction, drawings sometimes miss air barrier continuity. Different materials that make up the air barrier have different surfaces and therefore different products need to be used depending on the circumstances to ensure the longevity of the air barrier over the life of the building.
Air Barrier Integrity Auditing, is a critical part of building commissioning, combination with an Airtightness champion who is an integral part of the construction team, coupled with good building design and detailing, airtightness targets of the likes of Passive house or even more stringent can be achieved as economically as possible.

Efficiency Matrix: Innovating Air Tightness Solutions for Australia
Efficiency Matrix is proud to lead the way in developing high-performing, Australian-made products that enhance energy efficiency and air tightness across residential and commercial buildings. With a strong focus on innovation and quality, we design and manufacture solutions tailored to the unique challenges of Australian construction.

Our product range includes:

Downlight Mitt: A premium solution for improving air tightness around downlights, ensuring better thermal and energy performance.
qVent: A cutting-edge ventilation product designed for optimal performance and energy efficiency.
Door Seals: Cost-effective yet premium-performing solutions for bottom-of-door and around-door air tightness, enhancing comfort and reducing energy loss.
Power Point Boxes and Draft Stoppers: Specifically designed for the Australian market, these products prevent air leakage through electrical outlets and improve indoor climate control.
Tight Plate and Tight Bridge: Innovative products designed for use with vapour-permeable wraps, offering a superior solution for air tightness in Australian-built homes.
In addition to our product offerings, Efficiency Matrix is actively involved in developing new construction details to improve air tightness in Australian homes. Our work supports the growing demand for energy-efficient buildings and helps builders achieve better performance outcomes with modern materials and methods.

All of our products are available at tighthouse.com.au, where we continue to expand our offerings with a commitment to quality, performance, and sustainability.

Efficiency Matrix isn’t just about delivering products; we’re about driving innovation in air tightness and energy efficiency, making Australian homes and buildings more comfortable, efficient, and sustainable for the future.

The Critical Role of Air Tightness Testing for Offshore Oil and Gas Rigs

Offshore oil and gas rigs operate in high-risk environments where safety, environmental control, and operational efficiency are critical. Air tightness testing of the facility, ductwork, and operational procedures plays an essential role in ensuring these standards. This testing is not only vital for the safety of personnel but also for regulatory compliance and efficient system operation.

Why Air Tightness Testing is Crucial

1. Occupant Safety
– Air tightness ensures that pressurized safe zones can protect personnel during emergencies, such as gas leaks or fires.
– Sealed environments are essential for the effective operation of fire suppression systems, preventing the spread of fire or hazardous gases.

2. Environmental Control
– Tight control over air leakage supports optimal temperature and humidity regulation, extending the lifespan of equipment and ensuring occupant comfort.
– It prevents the ingress of unfiltered air, which can compromise sensitive equipment and operational efficiency.

3. Energy Efficiency and Operational Reliability
– Air leakage increases the workload of HVAC systems, reducing their efficiency and leading to higher energy costs.
– Maintaining airtightness minimizes these inefficiencies and ensures system reliability.

4. Regulatory Compliance
– Offshore oil and gas rigs must meet stringent regulatory standards for airtightness to continue operations.

—
OPSEMA’s Role in Air Tightness Verification

The Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Safety Authority (NOPSEMA) oversees safety and environmental compliance for offshore facilities in Australia. NOPSEMA plays a critical role in verifying the air tightness of oil rigs as part of their ongoing operational requirements.

– Operational Safety Verification:
NOPSEMA mandates regular testing to ensure air tightness meets industry standards, contributing to the safety of personnel and equipment on offshore rigs.

– Compliance with Leakage Rate Targets:
NOPSEMA enforces compliance with specific airtightness targets:
– 0.35 ACH @ 50 Pa for existing oil rigs.
– 0.25 ACH @ 50 Pa for new oil and gas rigs.

– Facility Inspection and Auditing:
Through routine inspections and audits, NOPSEMA ensures that facilities adhere to airtightness standards and that operators take corrective action to resolve any identified deficiencies.

—
Key Areas for Air Tightness Testing

1. Facility Airtightness
– Structural elements, such as walls, doors, and penetrations for cables and utilities, must be sealed to meet leakage rate targets.
– Special attention is needed for areas where hundreds of cables pass through walls, as improper sealing can significantly compromise airtightness.

2. Ductwork Airtightness
– Ductwork in HVAC systems must be tested to prevent air leakage, which can disrupt pressurized zones and impact fire suppression effectiveness.

3. Operational Procedures
– Operational protocols must align with airtightness requirements, ensuring that emergency isolation systems and fire suppression systems work as designed.

—

Target Leakage Rates for Offshore Rigs

Air tightness for offshore oil rigs is measured by air change per hour (ACH) at 50 Pascals (Pa). The target rates are:
– Existing Rigs: 0.35 ACH @ 50 Pa
– New Rigs: 0.25 ACH @ 50 Pa

These targets ensure optimal safety and operational efficiency while meeting regulatory requirements.

—
Benefits of Achieving Target Leakage Rates

1. Enhanced Safety
– Proper airtightness ensures pressurized safe zones and effective fire suppression, protecting personnel during emergencies.

2. Regulatory Compliance
– Meeting NOPSEMA’s requirements ensures the continued operation and certification of offshore facilities.

3. Operational Efficiency
– Reduced air leakage lowers energy consumption and enhances the performance of HVAC systems.

4. Environmental Protection
– Tight control of air leakage prevents the escape of hazardous gases into the environment, supporting sustainability goals.

5. Equipment Longevity
– Sealed environments reduce strain on systems, extending the lifespan of critical equipment.

—

Testing and Procedures

1. Baseline Air Tightness Testing
– Establishes current leakage rates and identifies areas for improvement.

2. Ductwork and System Testing
– Ensures that duct systems are sealed to meet leakage rate targets and maintain effective airflow.

3. Emergency Simulations
– Tests the performance of pressurized zones, fire suppression systems, and emergency isolation protocols under simulated conditions.

4. Post-Repair Verification
– Confirms that repairs or improvements have successfully achieved target leakage rates.

5. Regular Re-testing
– Periodic testing ensures continued compliance with NOPSEMA standards and operational safety requirements.

—
Why Choose Efficiency Matrix for Offshore Rig Testing?

Efficiency Matrix specializes in providing advanced airtightness testing for offshore facilities, ensuring compliance with NOPSEMA standards and achieving industry-leading leakage rates. Our services include:
– Advanced Testing Equipment: Precision tools for measuring and improving air tightness in facilities and ductwork.
– Regulatory Expertise: Knowledgeable in NOPSEMA compliance requirements for both new and existing rigs.
– Tailored Solutions: Customized recommendations to enhance safety, efficiency, and airtightness.
– Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed documentation to support regulatory audits and operational planning.

By partnering with Efficiency Matrix, offshore operators can ensure the safety of their facilities, maintain regulatory compliance, and optimize operational efficiency for long-term success.

Efficiency Matrix: Leaders in Air Tightness Testing and Consulting

With over 15 years of experience in air tightness testing, Efficiency Matrix has established itself as a trusted authority in the field. Founded in June 2009, we specialize in commercial and residential pressure testing across Australia, with projects extending to international locations. Our expertise spans industries, building types, and scales—from the smallest structures to the largest, most complex buildings in the country.

—
Why Choose Efficiency Matrix?

1. Comprehensive Expertise
– Experience: Decades of combined experience in air leakage testing for buildings, computer rooms, data centers, and even offshore oil rigs.
– Green Star Expertise: A thorough understanding of Green Star requirements for commercial and residential buildings ensures compliance and optimal results for energy efficiency.
– Consultative Approach: We go beyond testing by assisting clients in achieving tangible results through detailed reporting, remediation works, and tailored advice.

2. Precision Equipment and Standards
– Our equipment is fully calibrated to manufacturers’ specifications and adheres to international testing standards, ensuring accuracy and reliability.
– Standards We Test To:
– ATTMA TSL1 & TSL2
– AS/NZS ISO 9972 (CIBSE TM23)
– USACE
– EN 13829:2001
– ASTM E779-10

3. Versatile Services
– Blower Door Testing: For commercial and residential properties.
– Thorough Air Tightness Inspections: With comprehensive reporting.
– Remediation Works: Ensuring air leakage issues are resolved effectively.
– Ductwork and Plenum Sealing: Inspection and both automated and manual sealing.
– Commercial Building Air Leakage Modelling: Providing predictive analytics for energy efficiency.
– Building Enclosure Commissioning (BECxA): Verification and consulting for building envelopes.
– Ultrasonic Sound Testing: Advanced techniques for air tightness diagnostics.
– Inspection of Risers: Using mining-grade inspection equipment.

4. Certifications and Training
– Retrotec Certified: Ensuring best practices in blower door testing.
– Thermography Certified: For advanced diagnostics and analysis.
– BOSIET (Offshore Certification): Allowing us to operate in offshore and high-risk environments.
– MSIC and Rail Industry Worker Certified: Demonstrating our versatility and compliance across sectors.

—
Key Projects and Industry Experience

– Computer Rooms and Data Centers: Large-scale pressure testing, including setup and inspection with advanced blower door systems.
– Ships and Offshore Rigs: Specialized air tightness testing in maritime and offshore environments.
– Residential and Commercial Buildings: From small homes to complex high-rise developments.

—
Our Team of Specialists

– John Konstantakopoulos: With extensive experience, John has conducted more large-building infiltration tests in Australia than anyone else. His deep relationships with major builders reflect his expertise and reliability.
– Joseph Chueng: A seasoned professional with 16 years in the construction industry, Joseph brings unparalleled expertise in energy efficiency consulting, blower door testing, and automated duct/plenum sealing.

—
Where We Serve
Efficiency Matrix operates across all major Australian cities, including:
– Melbourne
– Hobart
– Adelaide
– Sydney
– Perth
– Darwin

—
Innovating Air Tightness Solutions

Efficiency Matrix not only delivers testing services but also develops premium products for improving air tightness and energy efficiency, such as:
– Downlight Mitt: A high-performing solution for air tightness around downlights.
– qVent: Innovative ventilation products.
– Door Seals: Cost-effective, premium solutions for airtight doors.
– Tight Plate and Tight Bridge: Specialized products for Australian homes, enhancing air tightness with vapor-permeable wraps.

—
Our Commitment

At Efficiency Matrix, we pride ourselves on delivering precise, actionable results. Whether you’re seeking Green Star compliance, resolving air leakage issues, or improving building performance, our expertise ensures your project is in the best hands. We don’t just test; we help you achieve excellence.

Ensuring Building Façade Performance and Safety: The Role of AAMA 501.2 Testing

The façade of a building is a critical component that provides structural support, insulation, and aesthetic appeal. Ensuring that the façade is designed, installed, and verified to meet the highest standards of performance and safety is vital for the success and longevity of the building. While Australia has a robust set of standards covering many aspects of façade performance, including prototype testing, it falls short in on-site verification of building façades. This is where AAMA 501.2 plays a crucial role.

—
What is AAMA 501.2 Testing?

AAMA 501.2 evaluates the quality of exterior wall system installations by assessing their resistance to water penetration. The test involves spraying a controlled amount of water onto the façade using specialized, calibrated equipment. This process simulates real-world conditions to identify any defects in the installation or design, such as:

– Workmanship Errors: Mistakes during installation that compromise the integrity of the façade.
– Complexity Challenges: Issues arising from the complexity of the façade system that may not be evident during initial construction.
– Design Shortcomings: Flaws in the façade design that allow water to penetrate and cause damage.

Catching these defects early, before construction is complete, allows for cost-effective remediation, minimizing damage to the building internals and reducing long-term risks.

—
Integration of Efficiency Matrix eIR Envelope Integrity Reporting

Efficiency Matrix enhances its AAMA 501.2 testing services by integrating eIR (Envelope Integrity Reporting) into the façade testing process. This system provides precise, real-time documentation of façade defects, enabling efficient resolution and adding significant value to the testing process.

Benefits of eIR Integration:

1. Precise Location Reporting
– eIR allows defects to be marked directly on floor plans with exact locations, ensuring that trades can easily find and address problem areas.
– This level of precision reduces time spent searching for issues and ensures remediation is targeted and effective.

2. Streamlined Remediation Process
– The ability to document and track the progress of defect resolution through the eIR system ensures that remediation is handled efficiently.
– Issues are logged with clear descriptions and marked-up floor plans, creating a seamless process from identification to approval.

3. Comprehensive Documentation
– All defects and testing results are documented in a paperless format, reducing administrative overhead while maintaining a detailed record for stakeholders.
– This documentation provides a valuable audit trail, supporting warranty claims and compliance requirements.

4. Predictive and Proactive Insights
– By analyzing testing data, eIR helps identify patterns and potential weak points, allowing proactive adjustments to designs or methods.
– Predicts performance metrics such as leakage rates and thermal consistency before issues escalate.

5. Collaboration Among Stakeholders
– Clear, precise defect reporting facilitates better communication between architects, contractors, and trades, ensuring alignment on quality expectations.

—

Why AAMA 501.2 Testing is Essential

1. Building Safety and Structural Integrity
– A faulty façade can compromise the building’s structural integrity, creating safety hazards for occupants and passers-by.
– Testing ensures that the façade meets safety standards, providing confidence in its ability to withstand environmental challenges.

2. Protection Against Water Damage
– Water ingress into a façade can lead to mold, mildew, and rot, which negatively impact indoor air quality and occupant health.
– Early identification and correction of weak points prevent costly repairs and long-term damage to the building structure.

3. Quality Assurance and Warranty Protection
– Testing to AAMA 501.2 provides confidence that the façade is installed correctly and minimizes the risk of warranty claims.
– Developers, contractors, and building owners can demonstrate due diligence in ensuring the quality and durability of the façade.

4. Cost Efficiency
– Addressing defects during construction is significantly cheaper and easier than performing repairs after the building is complete.
– Early defect detection reduces the likelihood of operational disruptions and costly retrofits.

5. Sustainability and Property Value
– A properly tested façade enhances energy efficiency, contributing to the building’s sustainability credentials.
– A well-maintained and tested façade increases the building’s value and marketability by ensuring long-term durability and safety.

—
The Value of AAMA 501.2 with eIR Integration

A building façade tested to AAMA 501.2 standards and supported by eIR Envelope Integrity Reporting offers unparalleled confidence in quality, safety, and performance. The ability to precisely locate and document defects ensures:

– Efficient and effective resolution of issues.
– A streamlined remediation process with clear records.
– Predictive insights to support proactive improvements.
– Improved collaboration and communication among project stakeholders.

By investing in AAMA 501.2 testing with eIR integration, you ensure your building façade meets the highest standards for durability and performance, reducing risks and protecting your investment for years to come.